Should artist statements be in third person? This question has sparked debates among artists, curators, and critics alike. While some argue that using the third person perspective adds a sense of objectivity and distance, others believe that it can detract from the personal connection and authenticity of the artist’s voice. In this article, we will explore the advantages and disadvantages of using the third person in artist statements and discuss the best practices for crafting an effective statement.
The use of the third person in artist statements can be seen as a way to maintain a level of detachment, allowing the viewer to focus on the artwork itself rather than the artist’s personal experiences. This approach can be particularly beneficial in contemporary art, where the emphasis is often on the concept or the medium rather than the artist’s biography. By presenting the artist’s intentions and motivations in a third-person narrative, the artwork can take center stage, enabling the viewer to engage with it on a more abstract level.
On the other hand, critics argue that using the third person can distance the artist from their work, making it seem less personal and authentic. An artist statement is an opportunity for the artist to share their unique perspective and the story behind their creation. By using the first person, the artist can establish a direct connection with the viewer, making the statement more relatable and engaging. This personal touch can help to convey the emotional and intellectual journey that the artist has undergone while creating the artwork.
Advocates of the third person perspective often point to the fact that it allows for a more objective analysis of the artist’s practice. It can help to highlight the formal aspects of the artwork, such as the use of color, composition, and technique, without getting bogged down by the artist’s personal biases. This can be particularly useful in academic or institutional contexts, where the focus is on the artwork’s contribution to the broader art discourse.
However, opponents argue that the third person perspective can sometimes come across as overly formal or even pretentious. It may give the impression that the artist is attempting to distance themselves from their work, rather than embracing it fully. This can be problematic, as it may undermine the artist’s ability to connect with their audience on a deeper level.
When crafting an artist statement, it is essential to strike a balance between objectivity and authenticity. One approach is to use a mix of first and third person perspectives. For example, the first paragraph can be written in the first person, introducing the artist and their background, while the subsequent paragraphs can switch to the third person to discuss the artwork and its themes. This allows the artist to establish a personal connection with the viewer while also providing an objective analysis of their work.
In conclusion, whether or not artist statements should be in third person is a matter of personal preference and artistic intent. Both perspectives have their merits, and the best approach may vary depending on the context and the artist’s goals. Ultimately, the key is to create a statement that effectively communicates the artist’s vision and connects with the viewer on both an intellectual and emotional level.
