Does the Crown Act Include Hair Color?
Hair color is a significant aspect of personal identity and expression, and it often plays a crucial role in various aspects of life, including entertainment. One of the most prominent questions that arise in this context is whether the Crown Act includes hair color. The Crown Act, also known as the CROWN (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair) Act, is a federal bill aimed at ending discrimination against individuals with natural hair, including braids, locks, and other natural hairstyles. This article delves into the question of whether hair color is included in the scope of the Crown Act.
The Crown Act was introduced in 2019 by Senator Cory Booker and Representative Ayanna Pressley, with the primary goal of protecting individuals from discrimination based on their natural hair. The act defines discrimination as any adverse action taken against an individual because of their hair texture, including, but not limited to, braids, locks, and other natural hairstyles. However, the question remains whether hair color is considered a part of this definition.
Hair color is a separate issue from hair texture, as it involves the use of chemicals or dyes to alter the natural color of one’s hair. While the Crown Act addresses discrimination against natural hair, it does not explicitly mention hair color. This raises the question of whether individuals with dyed hair, regardless of their natural hair texture, are protected under the act.
Some argue that hair color should be included in the scope of the Crown Act, as it can also be a source of discrimination. For instance, individuals with dyed hair may face discrimination in the workplace, schools, or other public spaces due to their appearance. Moreover, hair color can be a part of one’s cultural identity, and excluding it from the act may inadvertently exclude individuals from the protection it offers.
On the other hand, others argue that hair color should not be included in the act, as it is a personal choice and does not inherently relate to discrimination based on hair texture. They believe that focusing on hair texture is more relevant to the act’s goals, as it directly addresses the discrimination faced by individuals with natural hair.
In conclusion, the question of whether the Crown Act includes hair color is a topic of debate. While the act does not explicitly mention hair color, some argue that it should be included to provide broader protection against discrimination. However, others believe that hair color is a separate issue and should not be included in the act. Regardless of the debate, it is essential to recognize the discrimination faced by individuals with natural hair and work towards a society that respects and celebrates all forms of hair, including natural and dyed hair.
