Why Do Crown Court Wear Wigs?
The tradition of judges and barristers wearing wigs in Crown Courts is a long-standing custom that has intrigued many. This article delves into the historical and symbolic reasons behind this peculiar practice, aiming to shed light on why Crown Court participants still don wigs today.
The origins of the wig tradition can be traced back to the 17th century, when judges and barristers began wearing them as a symbol of professionalism and authority. At that time, wigs were considered a status symbol, as they were expensive and difficult to obtain. By wearing wigs, judges and barristers were able to distinguish themselves from the general population and assert their status as members of the legal profession.
One of the primary reasons for the use of wigs in Crown Courts is their association with the legal profession’s history. In the past, judges and barristers were required to have a formal education, which often included studying Latin. Wigs were believed to enhance the dignity of the legal process by reminding everyone of the intellectual rigor and scholarly background of the participants. This connection to the past reinforces the importance of tradition within the legal system.
Another reason for the continued use of wigs is their symbolic representation of impartiality. The wig, as a neutral and unchanging article of clothing, is seen as a symbol of the judge’s ability to remain unbiased and fair in their decision-making. By wearing a wig, judges are reminded of their duty to uphold justice and to treat all parties involved in the case with equality.
Furthermore, the wig tradition helps to maintain a sense of continuity and stability within the legal system. As a centuries-old custom, it serves as a reminder of the legal profession’s rich history and the values it stands for. This continuity can be comforting to those who are involved in the legal process, as it provides a sense of familiarity and predictability.
Despite the historical and symbolic reasons for wearing wigs, some argue that the tradition is outdated and unnecessary. Critics point out that the use of wigs can be seen as a form of discrimination, as it is a practice that is not required of judges and barristers in other jurisdictions. Additionally, the cost and time required to maintain a wig can be seen as a burden on the legal profession.
In conclusion, the tradition of wearing wigs in Crown Courts is a reflection of the legal profession’s history, its values, and its commitment to impartiality. While some may argue that the practice is outdated, it remains an important symbol of tradition and continuity within the legal system. Whether or not the tradition will continue to be observed in the future remains to be seen, but for now, the wigs worn by judges and barristers serve as a reminder of the rich heritage and principles that underpin the legal profession.
